Deploying SaaS MVP: AWS vs Vercel vs Railway
All Articles
EngineeringMay 1, 20266 min read

Deploying SaaS MVP: AWS vs Vercel vs Railway

We migrated 3 times. Here's where we landed.

The Migration Story

2019: AWS. Complex. Powerful. Exhausting.

2021: Vercel. Simple. Fast. Perfect for Next.js.

2023: Railway. Simple. Flexible. Cheaper.

Here's what we learned.


AWS

The Good

  • Everything
  • You can build anything
  • Most powerful option

The Bad

  • Complex
  • Expensive
  • Requires DevOps expertise

When to Use

Enterprise requirements. Custom infrastructure. Specific compliance needs.


Vercel

The Good

  • Zero config
  • Edge network
  • Perfect Next.js integration
  • Great DX

The Bad

  • Next.js only (mostly)
  • Can get expensive at scale
  • Less control

When to Use

Next.js apps. JAMstack sites. Fast deployment.


Railway

The Good

  • Simple deployment
  • Persistent storage
  • Good pricing
  • Postgres built-in

The Bad

  • Less mature
  • Smaller ecosystem
  • Some rough edges

When to Use

Node.js apps. Databases. Side projects.


Our Current Stack

Vercel for Frontend

Next.js apps deploy in seconds.

Global edge network. Automatic HTTPS.

Railway for Backend

Node.js APIs. Cron jobs. Databases.

Simple. Persistent. Affordable.


The Decision Framework

App TypePlatform
Next.jsVercel
Node.js APIRailway
Static siteVercel
Complex infraAWS

The Honest Answer

Use the simplest option that works.

Vercel for Next.js. Railway for everything else.

AWS is powerful. It's also overkill for MVPs.

Continue Reading

More from the Studio

Let's Build Together

Ready to Build Something Remarkable?

Book a free 30-minute call. We'll scope your project, answer your questions, and tell you exactly how we'd build it.